πŸ€‘ Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube

Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days πŸ–

Filter:
Sort:
BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

One of the measurements NuSTAR will make is how fast black holes are spinning. So, much like a roller skater or ice skater is spinning with her arms out and they bring their arms in and they start spinning faster and faster, material --as it falls in on a black hole -- starts spinning faster and faster as it gets closer into the black hole.


Enjoy!
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

A black hole almost 8,000 light years away from Earth has caught the eye of astronomers, due to its peculiar, wobbly nature.. Astronomers spot black hole ejecting plasma and spinning so fast.


Enjoy!
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Valid for casinos
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

When it comes to catching up on science, you want someone clear, engaging, and accurate. Because your time matters.


Enjoy!
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

In 1974, theorists William Press and Saul Teukolsky noted that if a black hole were spinning fast enough, light of a long-enough wavelength passing close by would scatter off it, rather than being.


Enjoy!
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
ALERT: Content in our deals section may not be visible when ad-blocking is enabled.
Please consider adding us hawk casinos colorado black your whitelist.
Studying distant black holes in any great detail is very difficult due to the fact that nothing, including light, can escape their grasp once its gets too close.
Now, a black hole sitting some 290 million light years from Earth has offered scientists the rare opportunity to measure its speed, super fast spinning black hole the numbers are mind-boggling.
Upon closer inspection and observations using additional instruments, scientists determined that the blast of X-ray super fast spinning black hole was coming from a star, but not just any star.
This star was in the midst of being torn apart by a black hole.
It was determined that the signal coming from the black hole was repeating super fast spinning black hole 131 seconds, giving researchers the incredibly special chance to measure the speed at which the black hole is spinning.
The researchers estimate that the black hole is spinning at roughly half the speed of light, or maybe even faster.
Light travels at nearly 300 million meters per second, or around 671 million miles per hour.
Even at half that speed, the black click is rotating at a truly unimaginable rate compared to anything humans are used to seeing.

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

β€œThat gives us information about the spin rate of the supermassive black hole itself.” But how fast is it? The researchers estimate that the black hole is spinning at roughly half the speed of light, or maybe even faster. Light travels at nearly 300 million meters per second, or around 671 million miles per hour.


Enjoy!
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Valid for casinos
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Black hole found spinning at such a speed it could BREAK the laws of physics

TT6335644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

A black hole's gravity is so strong that, as the black hole spins, it drags the surrounding space along. The edge of this spinning hole is called the event horizon. Any material crossing the event horizon is pulled into the black hole. Inspiraling matter collects into an accretion disk, where friction heats it and causes it to emit X-rays.


Enjoy!
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Super-Fast Spinning Supermassive Black Hole Will we be Sucked In . Black holes evade our understanding, shrouding themselves in an impenetrable event horizon that nothing can escape from. Dr. k.


Enjoy!
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
The Black Hole Bomb and Black Hole Civilizations

JK644W564
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

brian0918 writes, "NewScientist reports that researchers in Cambridge have detected a black hole spinning at nearly 1,000 times per second β€” the fastest ever recorded. . From the article: 'McClintock's team examined a black hole in our galaxy called GRS 1915+105, which lies about 36,000 light years


Enjoy!
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

All these measurements feed into the equation to measure how fast a black hole is spinning. What Exactly is Spinning, Again? "The black hole spin frequency we measured is the rate at which spacetime is spinning, or is being dragged, right at the black hole event horizon," said Narayan. This black hole is about 14 solar masses.


Enjoy!
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

B6655644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

β€œThat gives us information about the spin rate of the supermassive black hole itself.” But how fast is it? The researchers estimate that the black hole is spinning at roughly half the speed of light, or maybe even faster. Light travels at nearly 300 million meters per second, or around 671 million miles per hour.


Enjoy!
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
In this artist's conception a supermassive black hole is surrounded by a hot accretion disk, while some inspiraling material is funneled into a wispy blue jet.
New measurements show that the black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 1365 is spinning at close to the maximum possible rate.
This suggests that it grew via "ordered accretion" rather than by swallowing random blobs of gas and stars.
Such an object exists: the supermassive black hole black game download the center of the spiral galaxy NGC 1365.
Astronomers measured its jaw-dropping spin rate using new data from the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array, or NuSTAR, and the European Space Agency's XMM-Newton X-ray satellites.
This research is being published in the Feb.
A black hole's gravity is so strong that, as the black hole spins, it drags the surrounding space along.
The edge of this spinning hole is called the event horizon.
Any material crossing the event horizon is pulled into the black hole.
Inspiraling matter collects into an accretion disk, where friction heats it and causes it to emit X-rays.
Risaliti and his colleagues measured X-rays from the center of NGC 1365 to determine where the inner edge of the accretion disk was located.
This Innermost Stable Circular Orbit - the disk's point of no return - depends on the black hole's spin.
Since a spinning black hole distorts space, the disk material can get closer to the black hole before being sucked in.
Scientists measure the spin rates of supermassive black holes by spreading the X-ray light into different colors.
The light comes from accretion disks that swirl around black holes, as shown in both of the artist's concepts.
They use X-ray space telescopes to study these colors, and, in particular, look for a "fingerprint" of iron -- the peak shown in both graphs, or spectra -- to see how sharp it is.
The "rotation" model shown at top held that the iron feature was being spread out by distorting effects caused by the immense gravity of the black hole.
If this model were correct, then the amount of distortion seen in the iron feature should reveal the spin rate of the black hole.
The alternate model held that obscuring clouds lying near the black hole were making the iron line appear artificially distorted.
If this model were correct, the data could not be used to measure black hole spin.
NuSTAR helped to solve the case, ruling out the alternate "obscuring cloud" model.
Astronomers want to know the black hole's spin for several reasons.
The first is physical - only two numbers define a black hole: mass and spin.
By learning those two numbers, you learn everything there is to know about the black hole.
Most importantly, the black hole's spin gives clues to its past and by extension the evolution of its host galaxy.
Although the black hole in NGC 1365 is currently as massive as several million Suns, it wasn't born that big.
It grew over billions of years by accreting stars and gas, and by merging with other black holes.
Spin results from a transfer of angular momentum, like playing on a children's swing.
If you kick at random times while you swing, you'll never get very high.
But if you kick at the beginning of each downswing, you go higher and higher as you add angular momentum.
Similarly, if the black hole grew randomly by pulling in matter from all directions, its spin would be low.
Since its spin is so close to the maximum possible, the black hole in NGC 1365 must have grown through "ordered accretion" rather than multiple random events.
Studying a supermassive black hole also allows theorists to test Super fast spinning black hole general theory of relativity in extreme conditions.
Relativity describes how gravity affects the structure of space-time, and nowhere is space-time more distorted than in the immediate vicinity of a black hole.
The team also has additional observations of NGC 1365 that they will study to determine how conditions other than black hole spin change over time.
Those data are currently being analyzed.
At the same time, other teams are observing several other supermassive black holes with NuSTAR and XMM-Newton.
CfA scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin, evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.
Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission.
The content is provided for information purposes only.
Three numbers define a black hole: Mass, angular momentum and charge.
Since its spin is so close to the maximum possible, I have a bit of a problem understanding this part.
Since the event horizon isn't a physical presence just an imaginary surface of no return why is it or rather the spatial dragging effect bound to a spin slower than the speed of light?
I wonder why velocity, location, and age are not considered properties of a BH?
Oh, and it is "electrical charge", fwiw.
Is spin more intrinsic than velocity?
Aren't both relative to frame of reference?
Spin is a vector, right?
So, is that "a number"?
How is spin vector defined in GR, 3-vector or 4?
Velocity is a vector and has no bearing on the nature of the black hole itself.
The hole could be standing still or moving at thousands of kilometers a sec, but it wouldn't be changed.
There is no way to tell the age of a black hole.
The accretion disk can carry clues, but a day-old hole and a billion year old look exactly the same.
Is spin rate of black hole defined in general relativity?
Gravitational singularity has no diameter and the event horizon around it has no surface roughness, which would allow to observe it.
Since its spin is so close to the maximum possible, I have a bit of a problem understanding this part.
Since the event horizon isn't a physical presence just an imaginary surface of no return why is it or rather the spatial dragging effect bound to a see more slower than the speed of light?
It would no more be a black hole, if any part of it could rotate facter than c.
A BH spinning so fast, is shaped like a '8'.
The event horizon must have a dent around the equator.
The charge can not originate from the black hole itself.
No mediator of electromagnetic forces or any fundamental force can get out.
That's the definition of the thing.
The charge is a result of frame draging i think.
A rotating black hole isn't a singular point object.
It becomes a finite rotating disk albiet a small one.
The spacial drag is tail freed x laxus to be related to gravity as magnetism is related to moving electric charges - a relitivistic effect.
It would no more be a black hole, if any part of it could rotate facter than c That's sort of the point.
The event horizon isn't a physical part of the BH just like the surfaces of constant potential between charged plates aren't physical parts of a capacitor - although in that case the force carriers are photons and changes in this surface WOULD be bound by the speed of light.
But the article above is worded a bit murky.
It seems to me they're talking about the speed of the framedragging effect.
And the speed of a dragged frame isn't limited by c, is it?
At least the speed of gravity hasn't yet been verified to be limited by c to my knowledge.
The LIGO experiment is still ongoing A rotating black hole isn't a singular point object.
It becomes a finite rotating disk albiet a small one Black hole is a concept of general relativity and it does recognize only singularity and event horizon, nothing else.
Everything else is just a subject of some hypothetical theory, which had not been developed yet.
When you are able to condense matter so that all its various quantum states including all symmetries like for example CPT collapse into 1 you get a black hole.
Simply said, black hole is a region of space which is occupied by energy in only 1 single super?
So when rotating there is no friction, a bit like with liquid helium flowing in a loop or with superconductors when they push out the magnetic field.
This also describes on the quantum scale why the light can not "escape" from a black hole.
Both the electromagnetic spectrum and space-time are simply pushed out of black hole so there is no light inside black hole to escape and the space-time seems warped around such object.
Now if only I knew how to put it into equations :P Any takers?
Three numbers define a black hole: Mass, angular momentum and charge.
Since its spin is so close to the maximum possible, I have a bit of a problem understanding this part.
Since the event horizon isn't a physical presence just an imaginary surface of no return why is it or rather the spatial dragging effect bound to a spin slower than the speed of light?
As I understand the phenomena frame dragging is "simply" space moving.
Since it's space I don't think there is a "speed limit" per se.
If a black hole is spinning at near the speed of light and you could move two other black holes near the poles of the first one, pulling it thinner, it should be like a figure skater spinning and drawing her arms in.
Would this result in a razor sharp equatorial disk rotating within a hair of light speed and a slack teepee shape rising at each pole?
I hadn't planned on trying this experiment btw.
So a black hole rips matter apart.
Seems to me it would have no mass.
But mass rushes towards it to fill that void but it does mimick a very massive thing seeing as how matter rushes to it.
Imagine a sphere more than 2 million miles across.
This horrible rate of spin would be roughly two revolutions per MINUTE.
Now, let's make a little thought experiment.
Say there is a lighthouse floating in space.
Its light is so powerful that you can spot it at a million miles.
Which is the same as the black hole's radius.
Say the light rotates at the same two revolutions per minute.
Now, what is the speed of the light cone at this distance of 1 million miles?
Answer: the speed of light.
Now make the light stronger so the radius is doubled.
What is the cone speed then?
Answer: twice the speed of light.
So, I think either Prof.
Risaliti, or the Caltech staff editor should do some more thinking.
Incidentally, in my latter ex.
He wouldn't know anything is "wrong".
Some spin, some not.
Reading this article, I was reminded again about the principle of that in physics there really isn't such a thing as free lunch.
So I am curious how much energy is being radiated away from the black hole because of frame dragging.
Obviously these space time distortions cost energy right?
Does this energy have a tendency to slow the spin rate, or does it come from the mass?
If frame dragging does have a tendency to slow the spin over time, the effect must be quite small, or there has to be a countervailing force that is constantly increasing the spin rate.
Anyone out there with more knowledge that I have any idea?
So far I have already commit mills black beauty penny slot machines apologise two Ones to my comment above.
Seems this is is way too abstract for those who can neither think nor have a calculator.
So I am curious how much energy is being radiated away from the black hole because of frame dragging.
Obviously these space time distortions cost energy right?
A BH is spherically symmetric so doesn't radiate.
Mergers and ripples in the surface due to infalling additions create transient asymmetry which radiates gravitational waves until the symmetry is restored.
That's why just three values define everything, any distortions of shape decay away rapidly.
Imagine a sphere more than 2 million miles across.
This horrible rate of spin would be roughly two revolutions per MINUTE.
Now, let's make a little thought experiment.
Say there is a lighthouse floating in space.
Its light is so powerful that you can spot it at a million miles.
Which is the same as the black hole's radius.
Say the light rotates at the same two revolutions per minute.
Now, what is the speed of the light cone at this distance of 1 million miles?
The path of a photon in that beam would be a null geodesic as always hence the speed measured relative to every observer it passes on that super fast spinning black hole is exactly the speed of light in vacuum.
I don't believe that speed for something so big.
I expect to see a correction or retraction of this article.
It just seems too ridiculous.
Three numbers define a black hole: Mass, angular momentum and charge.
As I understand the phenomena frame dragging is "simply" space moving.
Since it's space I don't think there is a "speed limit" per se.
Correct, speed depends on the coordinate system and distance from the BH, the term has been simplified for the press, GR actually places a limit on the angular momentum as has been said previously.
Everyone Talks about this article as if our knowledge is 100% right about those tiny dots captured by some EXTRAORDINARY weak weak telescopes any kind I mean.
Why don't anyone question the process how they take a picture or analyze those pictures.
I mean, literally, we should as questions about how those pictures are taken, analyzed and interpreted.
We still can't take an HD photo of Mars with the most advanced telescope i.
Hubble etcyet these so called scientists give us extreme details about things that are so far that the distance between Earth and Mars becomes insignificant.
I am sorry, but I just don't buy these articles as true.
These articles are for the naive.
So I am curious how much energy is being radiated away from the black hole because of frame dragging.
Obviously these space time distortions cost energy right?
So your saying that frame dragging doesn't require any energy?
I find that surprising, but at the same time I know that the slowing of time because of the gravitational field doesn't take any energy so I guess I can buy that.
A BH is spherically symmetric so doesn't radiate.
Mergers and ripples in the surface due to infalling additions create transient asymmetry which radiates gravitational waves until the symmetry is restored.
That's why just three values define everything, any distortions of shape decay away rapidly.
Conversations I've seen about black hole theories: The geometry of black holes might be a continuum from spheres to toroids depending on spin rate.
The geometry also can be affected by proximity to other gravity wells like companion stars or other black holes.
The center region outside of the event horizon of the toroid is a kind of crucible which forms the jets that emanate from the "pols" and might be what looks like a quasar when pointed gameshark all codes pokemon earth.
Black holes are only understood in terms of relativity.
Quantum mechanics might not actually allow the creation of "singularities", but rather space-time-matter-energy might exist in a phase form not yet described.
TBH: And regarding age of a BH, the singularity might grow to meet the event horizon: Far out stuff!
That's sort of the point.
The event idea card game red and black suggest isn't a physical part of the BH.
But the article above is worded a bit murky.
It seems to me they're talking about the speed of the framedragging effect.
And the speed of a dragged frame isn't limited by c, is it?
Yes, but the event horizon is the only part of the BH that is connected to our space-time.
It's a boundary, where the escape velocity is always c.
If the event horizon rotates, the escape velocity would be lower at the equtor.
But that can not happen.
It would go against tha upper definition.
So a rotating BH's event horizon behaves counterintuitive.
The faster it rotates, the more dented it becomes around the equator.
A rotating BH is not flatened, like a rotating neutron star, it must be elongated towards the poles.
The frame can be dragged faster than c?
But that has nothing to do with where the boundary event horizon is.
It's always where the photons move paralel to each other, never falling in never escaping.
Are we talking "spin" as in QM, or "angular momentum" as in CM?
Because clearly something infinitely small can have no angular momentum and like others super black online game pointed out the EH is a derived property, not an object, so can't rotate independently of the object it's a property of.
The EH also isn't a perfect sphere and appears to repel from mass.
A VERY dense accretion disk would indent the EH at the disk plane and extend it at the poles.
So your saying that frame dragging doesn't require any energy?
I find that surprising, but at the same time I know that the slowing of time because of the gravitational field doesn't take any energy so I guess I can buy that.
Well you can think of gravity round the Earth as being a curvature generated by the energy mass of the planet but once formed, it takes no more energy to maintain it.
The same applies to the black hole, you have to feed it angular momentum to create the curved frames which we see as drag but once it is spinning, the effect is always there.
If an object moves closer and is accelerated, conservation of angular momentum means the BH will be slowed slightly but of course it regains what it lost when the object falls in.
Everyone Talks about this article as if our knowledge is 100% right about those tiny dots captured by some EXTRAORDINARY weak weak telescopes any kind I mean.
Why don't anyone question the process how they take a picture or analyze those pictures.
Because those problems are explained in the detailed papers and science has a rule that anything published has to be "peer reviewed" first.
It has to be checked critically by people not involved in the study who are sufficiently qualified to identify any problems in the analysis.
The other point is that this is not an unusual result for smaller stellar black holes.
To those who insist that 'charge' is a separate and discreet number that can be assigned to a black hole: if this is true, then there must be a mechanism by which a surplus of positively or negatively charged particles are included in the mass of the black hole not that they are now particles, as such, in that extreme environmentand oppositely charged particles, in some unbalanced amount, are ejected as radiation.
One would think that we might https://davpon.ru/black/free-pc-games-download-call-of-duty-black-ops.html methods of observation to confirm this.
Which brings me to a second point: if you tear assunder an electron or proton to be incorporated into the mass of a black hole, does the charge of that former particle somehow linger on without the particle itself?
I'm not sure I've heard a theoretical answer to that question and an empirical answer might be rather difficult to obtain!
One would think that we might devise methods of observation to confirm this.
It is theoretically possible, however a positively charged BH would tend to repel incoming protons and attract electrons from the accretion disc so it is likely that they will be close to neutral in practice hence very difficult to observe.
Which brings me to a second point: if you tear assunder an electron or proton to be incorporated into the mass of a black hole, does the charge of that former particle somehow linger on without the particle itself?
The particles will merge with whatever form exists at the centre, current theory cannot say, but charge is conserved so will add to that of the BH.
The 'observables' - frame dragging and the waves have not been detected.
There are two camps.
They will be detected.
They will not be detected.
There is a third camp that thinks frame dragging was confirmed in 2004 and gravitational radiation indirectly in 1978: Any bets that, assuming it's possible, it's proven that singularities do not exist at the center of black holes and the mass has a finite volume?
Infinities don't exist, either big or small or it was the unalterable future that I posted this.
Any bets that, assuming it's possible, it's proven that singularities do not exist at the center of black holes and the mass has a finite volume?
I suspect that's what most scientists expect, the question is what is the nature of the energy in that state.
Infinities don't exist, either big or small.
Infinite bear casino exists but absolute zero doesn't.
I don't see the connection.
In general relativity the black hole is formed with space-time only and the space-time cannot rotate just in general relativity.
Such an object can already rotate and drag its neighborhood like the whirlpool.
In general relativity the black hole is formed with space-time only and the space-time cannot rotate just in general relativity.
Rubbish, a rotating black hole is described by the Kerr Metric solution to GR: Don't spread disinformation if you can't https://davpon.ru/black/isle-casino-black-hawk.html be bothered to check Wikipedia, never mind actually learning the subject.
Of course, the quantum mechanics will beat whole the black hole concept on its head and it will make it comparable to very dense star with fuzzy physical surface roughly equivalent to the surface of event horizon.
Almost, it will be a very dense fuzzy object but with a size smaller than a neutron, probably around the deBroglie wavelength of the components since the degeneracy pressure produced by the Pauli Exclusion principle has already been overcome.
So a rotating BH's event horizon behaves counterintuitive.
The faster it rotates, the more dented it becomes around the equator.
A rotating BH is not flatened, like a rotating neutron star, Well the event horizon isn't flattened, but you get the ergosphere the area where framedragging happens which is flattened: When I read the wikipedia link I come accros: Within the ergosphere, spacetime is dragged along in the direction of the rotation of the black hole at a speed greater than the local speed of light in relation to the rest of the universe.
Which seems to contradict what the article claims: New measurements show that the black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 1365 is spinning at close to the maximum possible rate.
Anyone know what I am missing?
When I read the wikipedia link I come across: Within the ergosphere, spacetime is dragged along in the direction of the rotation of the black hole at a speed greater than the local speed of light in relation to the rest of the universe.
Which seems to contradict what the article claims: New measurements show that the black hole at the center of galaxy NGC 1365 is spinning at close to the maximum possible rate.
Anyone know what I am missing?
It's not your problem the article is badly written.
The actual finding is that the BH has nearly the maximum angular momentum which affects the radius of the internal horizons.
The location where the tangential speed is the speed of light is the definition of the outer boundary of the ergosphere so that "surface" moves at the speed of light by definition.
This gives a lot more detail!
If a black hole is spinning at click to see more the speed of light and you could move big game black widow reviews other black holes near the poles of the first one, pulling it thinner, it should be like a figure skater spinning and drawing her arms in.
Would this result in a razor sharp equatorial disk rotating within a hair of light speed and a slack teepee shape rising at each pole?
I hadn't planned on trying this experiment btw.
Also the other two would have to be almost the exact same distance away from the first and they would all have to have the same velocity and trajectory.
Does this energy have a tendency to slow the spin rate, or does it come from the mass?
If frame dragging does have a tendency to slow the spin over time, the effect must be quite small, or there has to be a countervailing force that is constantly increasing the spin rate.
The voyager spacecraft proves this with the famous "sling-shot" maneuver, which robs Jupiter of a tiny amount of "angular momentum".
This becomes "Kinetic Energy" by definition of the term Kinetic Energy, since it modifies the crafts "velocity".
Although I personally believe that one or the other of "Momentum" and "kinetic Energy" must be a "fictitious force" that's another discussion.
However, with Black Holes there is another issue, since they supposedly warp space-time, so that all dimensions become "time-like".
It is suggested by some black hole physicists or at least science authors attempting to explain them, that the dimensions of space itself "fall"into the black hole, so that not just the matter or energy, but "dimension" becomes trapped in the black hole.
This led to the thought experiment of whether a black hole might be larger on the inside than on the outside.
I think the first time I saw this proposed semi-formally was in a black hole related novel by Clifford Pickover, though it may have been explored previously by Stephen Hawking or by science fiction authors.
Pickover was writing "real" science theory, but was using a series science fiction short stories and examples to illustrate principles.
The point is the "axis" of dimension begins to fall into the black hole, not just the matter or energy those dimensions contain, and because of this, if you were inside the event horizon of a Bh and looked towards it's CoG, you would see another event horizon and another and another.
Which brings me to a second point: if you tear assunder an electron or proton to be incorporated into the mass of a black hole, does the charge of that former particle somehow linger on without the particle itself?
I'm not sure I've heard a theoretical answer to that question and an empirical answer might be rather difficult to obtain!
Perhaps the LACK of it's charge lingers outside of the black hole.
Fleetfoot Gravity B Probe project was terminated.
I believe the project was curtailed because the data had a higher level of random noise than was expected.
Last I heard, the suspicion was that it was due to static charge buildup on the quartz sphere gyros but that was some years ago, they may have confirmed the cause since then.
The final results are here: There may be more on the problems you can trace from that site.
Your second link was to this article itself so I don't know if you wanted me to read something else.
Until someone works out a theory which combines GR and QM, nobody knows what happens at the Planck scale.
Somewhere beyond the onset of the QGP, the process of baryogenesis will reverse and at some stupidly high density, gravitational waves may become comparable to other forms buses to black river falls casino energy so free download game call of duty black ops 2 all becomes speculative at present Visit web page />That is only valid for an object in its rest frame.
Although I personally believe that one or the other of "Momentum" and "kinetic Energy" must be a "fictitious force" that's another discussion.
Neither is a force but you are right, kinetic energy isn't something in isolation.
The energy is the projection of the momentum-energy 4-vector onto the time axis and the "kinetic" part is just the amount by which that exceeds the rest energy.
One definition of mass is that it is the magnitude of the 4-vector.
Only the radial direction switches to being time-like as the light cones lean by more than 45 degrees.
It is the new way of looking at the oldest concept known to humankind - the concept of time.
And all this time I thought it was sex.
And you know what happens beyond this too.
Sure, just as there is a plateau at the Haegdorn Temperature, but beyond that things change.
We don't know how far that effect will last but they are many orders of magnitude short of the Planck scale and haven't even approached the GUT scale yet.
Beyond that we know nothing.
Shouldn't the area within the event horizon of a black hole be an ever-growing sphere, toroid or like the rings of Saturn due to infinite or near-infinite time dilation in that region?
I'd expect the inside of a black hole to have the nucleus of whatever initially collapsed at the center, surrounded by matter in whatever state it was in when it crossed the event horizon - suspended in that time, state and position forever or nearly forever relative to normal space.
I imagine it would begin at the initial event horizon and as it fell in, it would increase the overall mass of the system and therefor push the event horizon and position of all future infalling matter out.
Relative to the nucleus, this area would have low density and massive radius?
Addendum to my previous super fast spinning black hole Like snow collecting on the ground.
The ground being the initial event horizon, and the snow flakes being the inbound particles?
We don't know how far that effect will last.
Well, that's what it is there for.
Quark gluon plasma dispels the notion of Haegdorn Temperature.
You know this, however.
The Hagedorn Temperature marks the phase transition.
Once it is complete, the temperature rises again.
It does not last.
Exactly, it could be either, we do not know which, https://davpon.ru/black/black-magic-free-spells.html I said.
Thank you for taking your time to send in your valued opinion to Science X editors.
You can be assured our editors closely monitor every feedback sent and will take appropriate actions.
Your opinions are important to us.
We do not guarantee individual replies due to extremely high volume of correspondence.
Note Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email.
Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose.
The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Phys.
You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.
Your Privacy This site uses cookies to assist with navigation, analyse your use of our services, and provide content from third parties.
By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our and.

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

of an artist's concept of a spinning black hole. Animation courtesy NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. Joern Wilms of Tuebingen University, Germany, and an international team of astronomers observed the novel "power tapping" with the European Space Agency's X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission (XMM-Newton) satellite by watching a supermassive black hole in the core of a galaxy named MCG-6-30-15.


Enjoy!
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

If the black hole twirls too fast, then the singularity is exposed. This is known as a β€œnaked singularity.” Scientists think it is impossible to reach because the known laws of physics would break down. The calculations made by Gralla, Warburton and their team showed that black-hole mergers sing when the larger black hole is spinning at.


Enjoy!
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Valid for casinos
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
ALERT: Content in our deals section may not be visible when ad-blocking is enabled.
Please consider adding us to your whitelist.
Studying distant black holes in any great detail is very difficult due to the fact that nothing, including light, can escape their grasp once its gets too close.
Now, a black hole sitting some 290 million light years from Earth has offered scientists the rare opportunity to measure its speed, and the numbers are mind-boggling.
Upon closer inspection and observations using additional instruments, continue reading determined that the blast super fast spinning black hole X-ray energy was coming from a star, but not just any star.
This star was in the midst of being torn apart by a black hole.
It was determined that the signal coming from the black hole was super fast spinning black hole every 131 seconds, giving researchers the incredibly special chance to measure the speed at which the black hole is spinning.
The researchers estimate that the black hole is spinning at roughly half the speed of light, or maybe even faster.
Light travels at nearly 300 million meters per second, or around 671 million miles per hour.
Even at half that speed, the black hole is rotating at a truly unimaginable rate compared to anything humans are used to seeing.

BN55TO644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

As it turns out, the mammoth black hole is spinning at a very fast velocity, one that was calculated to be half the speed of light. This incredible revelation came after the team picked up a very intense X-ray signal coming from ASASSN-14li, which was most likely produced by leftover material from the dying star.


Enjoy!
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

T7766547
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

A rotating black hole is a solution of Einstein's field equation. There are two known exact solutions, the Kerr metric and the Kerr–Newman metric, which are believed to be representative of all rotating black hole solutions, in the exterior region. State transition


Enjoy!
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
ALERT: Super fast spinning black hole in our deals section may not be visible when ad-blocking is enabled.
Please consider adding us super fast spinning black hole your whitelist.
Studying distant black holes in any great detail is very difficult due https://davpon.ru/black/black-tiger-game-download.html the fact that nothing, including light, can escape their grasp once its gets too close.
Now, a black hole sitting some 290 million light years from Earth has offered scientists the rare opportunity to measure its speed, super fast spinning black hole the numbers are mind-boggling.
Upon closer inspection and observations using additional instruments, scientists determined that the blast of X-ray energy was coming from a star, but not just any star.
This star was in the midst of being torn apart by a black hole.
It was determined that the signal coming from the black hole was repeating every 131 seconds, giving researchers the incredibly special chance to measure the speed at which the black hole is spinning.
The researchers estimate that the black hole is spinning at roughly half the speed of light, or maybe even faster.
Light travels at nearly 300 million meters per second, or around 671 million miles per hour.
Even at half that speed, the black hole is rotating at a truly unimaginable rate compared to anything humans are used to seeing.

CODE5637
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 1000

Super-Fast Spinning Supermassive Black Hole Will we be Sucked In . Black holes evade our understanding, shrouding themselves in an impenetrable event horizon that nothing can escape from. Dr. k.


Enjoy!
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

G66YY644
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
50 xB
Max cash out:
$ 200

A black hole has been found to be spinning faster than ever seen before, a new analysis suggests. The finding supports the idea that only fast-spinning stars can collapse to create powerful.


Enjoy!
Supermassive black hole spins super-fast
Valid for casinos
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments
Black hole found spinning at such a speed it could BREAK the laws of physics

A7684562
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
60 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

Shop Black Hole Saltwater Fishing Rods Black Hole has seen how fast a fish you thought you had can suddenly disappear into darkness. Their high-end saltwater fishing rods have been helping anglers from Korea to Florida see the light on the water since 1988.


Enjoy!
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Valid for casinos
Supermassive black hole spins super fast | Smithsonian Insider
Visits
Dislikes
Comments

A67444455
Bonus:
Free Spins
Players:
All
WR:
30 xB
Max cash out:
$ 500

A black hole's gravity is so strong that, as the black hole spins, it drags the surrounding space along. The edge of this spinning hole is called the event horizon. Any material crossing the event horizon is pulled into the black hole. Inspiraling matter collects into an accretion disk, where friction heats it and causes it to emit X-rays.


Enjoy!
Astronomers spot black hole spinning unbelievably fast as it swallows up a star – BGR
Valid for casinos
Super Fast Spinning Super Massive Black Hole 28, 2017 | 2017 - YouTube
Visits
Dislikes
Comments